A social history of Jamaican album covers
- Thread starter nzshadow
- Start date
Not sure why this would be Strutnip, aside from it's overall lameness and numerous glaring factual errors.
Horseleech said:Not sure why this would be Strutnip
Because it's whitey holding forth on what does and does not constitute "realness" in the presentation of some particular aspect of non-white culture, long one of soulstrut's chief exports. Extra points for framing artists as socio-political signifiers first and creative individuals second, if at all.
Were the same article written concerning a genre less rooted in danceability, it might very well instead be Waxidermynip. But since it's reggae, here we are.
Because it's whitey holding forth on what does and does not constitute "realness" in the presentation of some particular aspect of non-white culture, long one of soulstrut's chief exports. Extra points for framing artists as socio-political signifiers first and creative individuals second, if at all.
Were the same article written concerning a genre less rooted in danceability, it might very well instead be Waxidermynip. But since it's reggae, here we are.
Horseleech said:Not sure why this would be Strutnip, aside from it's overall lameness and numerous glaring factual errors.
this & as "jon" points out in the coments section
(and jon's other comments are also spot on)
this would have been B- high school report material in the pre-internet era,
but with all the info available today to research the subject
the author should be embarrassed
this & as "jon" points out in the coments section
(and jon's other comments are also spot on)
this would have been B- high school report material in the pre-internet era,
but with all the info available today to research the subject
the author should be embarrassed
By the mid-???80s, however, the comic-book style degenerated into an excuse to put out bad artwork quickly.
...The album covers reflect the hard times, as the genre contributed some of the worst covers you???ll ever see from this period.
Sigh.
The impressions left behind on Jamaica???s album covers, however, point to a wider and more fragmented social history, one that lacks the conformity of a marketing campaign and that contains the multitude of contradictions in the postcolonial experience.
Double sigh + groan.
b/w
Blood and Fire to the rescue of reggae!!
...The album covers reflect the hard times, as the genre contributed some of the worst covers you???ll ever see from this period.
Sigh.
The impressions left behind on Jamaica???s album covers, however, point to a wider and more fragmented social history, one that lacks the conformity of a marketing campaign and that contains the multitude of contradictions in the postcolonial experience.
Double sigh + groan.
b/w
Blood and Fire to the rescue of reggae!!
It seemed like he had a point to make and went looking for record covers that proved it rather than the other way around where you would look at a lot of covers and then trying to analyze them. For instance, there are a ton of early Ska covers of Prince Buster released in England of him decked out like a gangster or a prince or Studio One covers made in Jamaica itself that showed smiling Jamaicans dancing and dressed up for the club that would contradict the beginning of his article. Also he overlooks the fact that there were a lot more vocal groups during the Rock Stead early Reggae period than previously and hence there were more groups on covers. Something obvious like that becomes a wave towards "egalitarianism" in record covers?
I might also add that there were plenty of instrumental ska acts, most famously the Skatalites and all their off shoots, Tommy McCook, Roland Alfonso, etc. and they all had album covers of the musicians sitting around or playing their horns. How does that disrupt the author's idea of "egalitarianism" in the Rock Steady era compared to the previous one?
Similar threads
