I must not have been that wrong. All I know from the clip was that the woman's argument was "it was taking forever to get seated and then get food." Sharpton to the rescue! It gots to be racism if you don't get your food fast. Unless you're white.
A little history is a good thing. Whether or not there was racism in this case is for the courts to decide. But in the past it has been shown that this type of discrimination is common. Remember the case of the Secret Service agents and Denny's Restaurant?
===
Racism is not something from the distant past.
I seem to always be writing these things here. A person could easily think that I spend my time obsessing on race issues. That is not true at all. It is just that Soulstrut is the only place where I commonly come across people spouting opinions about race that are wrong and often offensive. This does not happen to me as I go about my daily life. Most people I am around know a little history. I rarely come across the attitude that racism ended when MLK gave the I Have A Dream Speech, an attitude that seems to permeate here at Soulstrut.
That may be true, regarding "for the courts to decide" but are we to take all matters to court? Or does crying foul necessarily mean you're right?
In any case, I wasn't disputing that discrimination is common. Terribly so. But my point was that Al Sharpton is an attention-loving charlatan. That's all.
I made no commentary regarding whether racism was present in America. Ultimately, I guess, if I were going to bring something to national attention and onto CNN I'd make damn sure I had some kind of damning evidence in my favor.
And Sharpton suing the woman afterwards is just the icing on the cake with respect to my initial point.
And finally, I know personally that racism didn't end with MLK, and a truly astonishing number of fools I know that are restrained in every other respect will occasionally drop some racist shit out of the clear blue sky. And I never, ever let that shit pass without saying something. But none of that changes my point about this case and the Hon. Rev. Al.
And jumping to conclusions about anyone's racism (i.e. mine) doesn't help the cause.
Sorry I misunderstood your post. You seemed to be doubting that racism could have played into the incident. Instead you were saying that Al Sharpton "is an attention-loving charlatan". I wont argue with that.