indiana45s said:If a person went to such great lengths to make album covers, there is almost near certainty that they did some kind of recording.
You think so? To me, it seems like all of this is obviously the handiwork of someone trying to get as close as possible to the music they love and the lifestyle that said music represents. But, the heightened degree of the mimicry (as well as the approach taken) makes me suspect that the guy was a non-musician--that, had he had the resources to at all reproduce anything approximating the musical content, he wouldn't have focused so intensely on the packaging. Plus, though I can't exactly pinpoint why, the fact that he painted right on the vinyl makes me think that the actual music was a very small part of the equation for Mike. All of the depictions are pretty literal: nightclubs, concert halls, shows in the park, fights, drugs. It seems like here he's reaching more for an emulation of the attitude, of the lifestyle; that, in his mind, the central creative act--the act of producing the music that would actually gain him entree into that world, that lifestyle--was probably relegated to the role of bothersome middle-man.
That being said, I sure hope I'm wrong. Any transmissions from this guy would almost certainly be nothing short of revelatory.