Mingering Mike - an IMAGINARY record collection?!

most amazing things i've seen in a long time! wall worthy for sure.





MINGE is also brit slang for VAGINA. i'm surprised that this has'nt been mentioned yet. peace, stein. . .
 
KARLITO said:jinx74 said:ummm maybe im reading the post wrong but what do those 45s sound like?





buy any paper stuff too like pictures, letters, anything that deals with this stuff. envelopes, or anything that is associated with this. as cool as this is i love paper stuff and that is sometimes cooler than the actual music itself.





tip: never leave anything. take it all. tapes, reels, photos, 1 sheets, stationary, music, everything.




When you say "tapes" do you mean cassette tapes. 'Cause if I bought all the unlabeled cassette tapes I see out in the field I'd have no room or money left. Acetates and reels, sure. But cassette tapes? Any way, the frontier of digging is in the discount VHS & DVD bins at drug stores, Big Lots etc. Just like w/ records in the past, all the good shit ends up in the "cutout" bin




I once bought a batch of unlabeled old cassette tapes at a car boot sale, I listened to them back at home and the first one was a recording of a woman singing with her little children in their house...It gave me such a spooky and weird feeling that I throwed away all the tapes and I promised myself never to buy anything like that...
 
A little late, but absolutely fanstastic. Thanks for sharing this with the world.





Drawings remind me somewhat of some of the album cover work for Fela.





That's just jaw-dropping, well done guys.
 
landon said:Mingering Mike...the real patron saint of crate digging!





This story has inspired me to put an end to my petty feud with Jawnny Cash. What do you say Jawn? Can you find it in your heart to forgive me?




OK Landon, it's your lucky day. Let's bury the hatchet. In the glorious light of Mingering Mike, I come to realize my crates just aren't as bulletproof as I thought. Whaddya say we team up and jack Secret Chimp for his Mingering Mike collection?





I'll call the four Nelly Olesons of the apocalypse, you get your punk ass crew together and we'll roll up on that fool and take Mingering Mike to Heaven where he rightly belongs.





Oh, and leave that punk Merlin Olsen at home.
 
Secret Chimp, this is obviously an unusual find. Apart from Fatback's 45s discovery. And since he couldn't find as many on his second visit as he had seen on the first visit, somebody else must have picked up a few copies as well, right?





The mystery of those cardboard pieces is of course intriguing. As is the fact that somebody would have gone to such length and made SO MANY fake albums and singles. Add to this the odds that that person (or a relative ?) would put it in storage for 30 years and somebody would then pick it up and offer it for sale between "real" records.





By now, though, I have to say that I find the reaction on this board almost as interesting as the find. Or may be even more.





Allow me to be a killjoy for a moment, please.


Not being a big fan of mahy forms of folk art anyway (this is how we've categorized this now, haven't we?) I might have a negative bias to start of with, but honestly, even if the idea's are good, the quality of the work is not all that, is it?


If you consider the presumed date of creation (1970s) and the demographics of the location of your find (Chocolate City) the themes of these covers are not that surprizing, are they?


I can not help but think of "relevance" and "impact" as helpful categories to look at creative work as much as "self expression" and general "quality".


Did Mindering Mike engage any audience with his works?. For all we know, Mingering Mike could have been a doodling child, a hermit without money for the records he desired or a wannabe record-sleeve designer who failed all applications - apart from the Sir Joe Quarterman job





Imagine people storing away all the spare print-outs of covers they've Photoshop'ed for their CD-Rs. Would we be as fascinated in 2035 if somebody found those? Think of all the creative work that people have displayed here on Soul Strut with manipulated images. Did MM ever engage anyone with his works in the way they have done?





Ann odd-ball find, for sure. Interesting and intriguing, to some extend. But is there ultimately more to it?


That's what I frequently ask myself when reading Dante's Left-Field Americana in Wax Poetics, by the way.
 
Look for Mingering Mike in Baltimore. No self respecting Washingtonian would record with The Colts Band.





Dan
 
LaserWolf said:Look for Mingering Mike in Baltimore. No self respecting Washingtonian would record with The Colts Band.





Dan




Here, here. That's the truth.
 
Cheesus - its Minger Mania 'round here. Over 4000 views?!


Wow.


I can't wait to see what becomes of all this.


Mingering Mike DVD/LP boxset.


Prolla!
 
Yemsky said:Secret Chimp, this is obviously an unusual find. Apart from Fatback's 45s discovery. And since he couldn't find as many on his second visit as he had seen on the first visit, somebody else must have picked up a few copies as well, right?





The mystery of those cardboard pieces is of course intriguing. As is the fact that somebody would have gone to such length and made SO MANY fake albums and singles. Add to this the odds that that person (or a relative ?) would put it in storage for 30 years and somebody would then pick it up and offer it for sale between "real" records.





By now, though, I have to say that I find the reaction on this board almost as interesting as the find. Or may be even more.





Allow me to be a killjoy for a moment, please.


Not being a big fan of mahy forms of folk art anyway (this is how we've categorized this now, haven't we?) I might have a negative bias to start of with, but honestly, even if the idea's are good, the quality of the work is not all that, is it?


If you consider the presumed date of creation (1970s) and the demographics of the location of your find (Chocolate City) the themes of these covers are not that surprizing, are they?


I can not help but think of "relevance" and "impact" as helpful categories to look at creative work as much as "self expression" and general "quality".


Did Mindering Mike engage any audience with his works?. For all we know, Mingering Mike could have been a doodling child, a hermit without money for the records he desired or a wannabe record-sleeve designer who failed all applications - apart from the Sir Joe Quarterman job





Imagine people storing away all the spare print-outs of covers they've Photoshop'ed for their CD-Rs. Would we be as fascinated in 2035 if somebody found those? Think of all the creative work that people have displayed here on Soul Strut with manipulated images. Did MM ever engage anyone with his works in the way they have done?





Ann odd-ball find, for sure. Interesting and intriguing, to some extend. But is there ultimately more to it?


That's what I frequently ask myself when reading Dante's Left-Field Americana in Wax Poetics, by the way.




Dude, I think you're missing it. These album covers were like a personal diary to this guy. I think for the most part, we are responding out of the human spirit that is evident in MM's work. I personally am seeing a real genuine person, with very noble ideas. Sure it might not be technically amazing, but you can tell that he put his HEART into these covers, and a lot of thoughtful decisions. This is something you rarely see with all these photoshop kids making fake CD covers.





I want to see his lyric sheets.
 
Yemsky said:


Did Mindering Mike engage any audience with his works?. For all we know, Mingering Mike could have been a doodling child, a hermit without money for the records he desired or a wannabe record-sleeve designer who failed all applications - apart from the Sir Joe Quarterman job







Damn you just about dissed all my favorite kinds of people.





Okay, so you are only into artists with big, breathing


audiences, in their day.





P-Funk was the bomb though.





To me this stuff is like gold, like Henry Darger meets Pedro Bell.
 
Terry_Clubbup said:Yemsky said:


Did Mindering Mike engage any audience with his works?. For all we know, Mingering Mike could have been a doodling child, a hermit without money for the records he desired or a wannabe record-sleeve designer who failed all applications - apart from the Sir Joe Quarterman job







Damn you just about dissed all my favorite kinds of people.





Okay, so you are only into artists with big, breathing


audiences, in their day.





P-Funk was the bomb though.





To me this stuff is like gold, like Henry Darger meets Pedro Bell.




I was just thinking about Pedro Bell, and the first Tom Tom Club album cover, whoever did that.
 
This all reminds me of the Langley Schools Music Project LP on one level: Some amatuer dabbling, never meant for many eyes or ears, that gets out and ends up resonating with people.





It's all about context and the sum of the whole being greater than the sum of the parts with stuff like this.





Dope.
 
Yemsky said:Secret Chimp, this is obviously an unusual find. Apart from Fatback's 45s discovery. And since he couldn't find as many on his second visit as he had seen on the first visit, somebody else must have picked up a few copies as well, right?





The mystery of those cardboard pieces is of course intriguing. As is the fact that somebody would have gone to such length and made SO MANY fake albums and singles. Add to this the odds that that person (or a relative ?) would put it in storage for 30 years and somebody would then pick it up and offer it for sale between "real" records.





By now, though, I have to say that I find the reaction on this board almost as interesting as the find. Or may be even more.





Allow me to be a killjoy for a moment, please.


Not being a big fan of mahy forms of folk art anyway (this is how we've categorized this now, haven't we?) I might have a negative bias to start of with, but honestly, even if the idea's are good, the quality of the work is not all that, is it?


If you consider the presumed date of creation (1970s) and the demographics of the location of your find (Chocolate City) the themes of these covers are not that surprizing, are they?


I can not help but think of "relevance" and "impact" as helpful categories to look at creative work as much as "self expression" and general "quality".


Did Mindering Mike engage any audience with his works?. For all we know, Mingering Mike could have been a doodling child, a hermit without money for the records he desired or a wannabe record-sleeve designer who failed all applications - apart from the Sir Joe Quarterman job





Imagine people storing away all the spare print-outs of covers they've Photoshop'ed for their CD-Rs. Would we be as fascinated in 2035 if somebody found those? Think of all the creative work that people have displayed here on Soul Strut with manipulated images. Did MM ever engage anyone with his works in the way they have done?





Ann odd-ball find, for sure. Interesting and intriguing, to some extend. But is there ultimately more to it?


That's what I frequently ask myself when reading Dante's Left-Field Americana in Wax Poetics, by the way.




MORON
 
Oh come on dude. He was just being honest. I can see where he is coming from. It's the cell phone customers getting to you man. Actually, come to think of it, I'm in the market for one. Soulstrut discounts? Plaese?
 
Did Mindering Mike engage any audience with his works?. For all we know, Mingering Mike could have been a doodling child, a hermit without money for the records he desired or a wannabe record-sleeve designer who failed all applications




Personally, I totally dig the Ming, but dude is not way outta line here. This shit is pretty hotly debated in the art community. I think when it comes down to it, it's a matter of taste, tastemakers, ect., if you follow.





Anyhow this is opening up a whole can of worms here. I would figure this would be big on Soulstrut, cause it's right up all our ally's, but all the lurkers makes me wonder what's up. OK, I'm rambling now.
 
If someone obviously misses the point on something like this, it's fine. Too bad for them, but no need to comment negatively on something if you don't have the capacity to understand or appreciate what it is, what it meant to the person who created it or what it's trying to communicate to others.
 
iron_monkey said:If someone obviously misses the point on something like this, it's fine. Too bad for them, but no need to comment negatively on something if you don't have the capacity to understand or appreciate what it is, what it meant to the person who created it or what it's trying to communicate to others.




If someone doesn't understand that I don't think there's any exlaining that will do. Its a way more emotional thing than a cerebral one.