JectWon said:onetet said:Never fully get this line of complaint. Yes, they didn't have rap in 1860... they also didn't have recorded music of any kind, not to mention movie cameras.
Not sure if you are talking about a different story...but The Great Gatsby takes place in 1922 and there was plenty of great recorded music to pull from.
I guess I just don't understand why the folks who made the movie feel they need to take such bold artistic liberties with a story that doesn't need any tweaking. Sure, there is no soundtrack to the book to follow.
It's a stubborn position for me to take, but I really enjoy when a movie adaptation sticks with the culture that was available during the time of the story.
My comments were generally addressing the idea that film music needs to wedded to the era in which the film takes place; the 1860s rap reference specifically was to those who have complained about the use of modern music in Django. I'm arguing that making movies in 2013 involves hundreds of tools that were not around in most prior periods of history, digital cameras being the most obvious; maybe our insistence that films' soundtracks limit themselves to music the characters could've heard in their era is limiting, unfairly focusing on one of these modern tools when we allow so many other contemporary devices to be used to tell the story.
I'm probably not going to be a fan of the new Gatsby, so this isn't meant as a defense of that film. There was a more reverent film version of the novel in the midst of Paramount's great run in the '70s--but while it's not as flat and lifeless as its reputation, it's also not great, and mostly of interest for the amazing cast:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Gatsby_(1974_film)
Not sure if you are talking about a different story...but The Great Gatsby takes place in 1922 and there was plenty of great recorded music to pull from.
I guess I just don't understand why the folks who made the movie feel they need to take such bold artistic liberties with a story that doesn't need any tweaking. Sure, there is no soundtrack to the book to follow.
It's a stubborn position for me to take, but I really enjoy when a movie adaptation sticks with the culture that was available during the time of the story.
My comments were generally addressing the idea that film music needs to wedded to the era in which the film takes place; the 1860s rap reference specifically was to those who have complained about the use of modern music in Django. I'm arguing that making movies in 2013 involves hundreds of tools that were not around in most prior periods of history, digital cameras being the most obvious; maybe our insistence that films' soundtracks limit themselves to music the characters could've heard in their era is limiting, unfairly focusing on one of these modern tools when we allow so many other contemporary devices to be used to tell the story.
I'm probably not going to be a fan of the new Gatsby, so this isn't meant as a defense of that film. There was a more reverent film version of the novel in the midst of Paramount's great run in the '70s--but while it's not as flat and lifeless as its reputation, it's also not great, and mostly of interest for the amazing cast:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Gatsby_(1974_film)