funky16corners said:tabira said:Question for y'all. I've read a lot of forum discussions on jazz organists and in most of them you get the obligatory respectful reference to "the master" Jimmy Smith almost as if to get him out of the way. The passion seems to be reserved for the Youngs, Pattons, McDuffs and McGriffs etc. You feelin' that too or not?
Smith gets props for being the breakout guy on the jazz organ (not the first by far, behind Fats Waller, Milt Buckner, Wild Bill Davis), and he had serious chops, but he spent a lot of prime time recording second-rate stuff for Verve, eventually being passed by guys like McDuff, McGriff, Lonnie Smith and Larry Young,
Jimmy Smith could jam his ass off, but I always thought he was slightly overrated. One of those cats I respect more than I actually listen to. The chops were there, but the songs weren't. Yeah, if you want to work up a sweat playing air organ, you could just throw on a Smith LP and go to town, but speaking for myself there's not much there I want to LISTEN to. Lotta flashy looka-here riffs, but that wears off quick. As opposed to McGriff, who wasn't trying to "floorshow," he just said what needed to be said. And when the dust clears, McGriff makes his way to my turntable more times than Smith does.
For me it breaks down like this:
Jimmy on Blue Note - generic, serviceable blues jams. Not unlistenable, but it does tend to recede into the background
Jimmy on Verve - here comes Oliver Nelson with his overdone horn arrangements. Yikes. Starts to get more and more into "soul Muzak" territory, and you can hear why organ jazz was soon taken for granted. (There was a Harvey Pekar cartoon which talked about how he got started writing about jazz; one panel shows a 1960's-era Pekar with an album in his hand, cussing Down Beat magazine for sending him yet another organ record, the likes of which were ubiquitous back then.)