You need to see more films then. There's level of suckitude far, far below the line you just drew. Not that any of those three films were somehow "good" (though personally, I found "Constantine" entertaining enough).
I dont think so, I have watched a lot of movies, a lot...a bad movie made by a no name directors, with no name actors, is a far more forgivable sin than a film like "21 grams", which is supposed to be a "good film"(I call it good because it was a critical fave) but lacks essential devices such as character development, creating a sympathy with said characters...there was nothing to care about any of those characters, one could give a shit what happened to them...nothing of interest in the any characters AT ALL. One of many bad things about that "good" movie. So what was the point of the movie? To me that is much worse filmaking than a throw away bad comedy like Cadyshack2 or a Jamie Kennedy movie. Something of that caliber. That is why I put "21 grams" at the top of that list.
As far as Constatine, it was a comic book movie that made the comic (something I have never read) seem like a pretentious hunka crap also. I doubt it is a bad as a comic as the movie made it seem, but that is kinda my point...it was so bad it made its source material unappealing. Kinda like a horable version of a cover song is usually always worse than a bad original song. Its in the delivery. I feel like they are prime examples of bad filmaking IMO. I stand by my choices.
