Rockadelic said:james said:On every level that matters--its importance to people, how well it does its job, its overall quality (that is, percentage of good shit to percentage of bullshit), etc.--music is exactly what it used to be. The human culture that it flows from and into, however, has changed to an almost unimaginable extent.
When people horn about how much music has changed and how far it's fallen, they're usually--whether they realize it or not--nostalgic for some past version of themselves or some past version of the world. It's been my experience that the more content a person is with their current self and current circumstances, the less likely they are to have a problem with current music.
Music was better back when your heart was newer.
Well said
People who are serious about their music tend to use their musical taste to represent what they want to project as their personality. Whether it's the Garage dude that won't listen to anything past July of '67 or the dreadlocked dude who thinks it all begins and ends with Marley. From my viewpoint only listening to music of one genre/time period makes that projected personality look pretty shallow.
My heart may be old but I try to keep my ears new...and it's not an easy thing to do.
I don't even segment my tastes by time. It's all about whether it sounds good and appeals to me. If it's trendy right now, it's not my concern.
Back in my record-store days, the hip-hop/dance music fans used to get on my case for liking so much old music. My response is: there's too much good shit to choose from, then and now. I can't just limit myself to "tomorrow's sound today."
(BTW, I have found that hip-hop/dance music fans get really preachy about keeping up with the trends. Without fail. I don't see fans of other kinds of music acting all uppity about being current. Even the most shallow indie-rock fan you know probably has a few CDs made before their birthday.)