This Piggy Wiggy Got Caught

[kala]

parallax saidatrickCrazy said:vintageinfants said:so what you're saying is that it's not fair to lump all policemen into the same pool based in the actions of a few?





man, I'll bet the POC population never has to deal with something like that.nah, not what i'm saying at all. learn how to read better




Brian, you're a soggy twat-waffle.







that's a given


hard to believe lupus still shows up for the cruddy game at all

 

[DOR]

PatrickCrazy said:Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah




I was going off reading that he dropped him as a client. Which happened right after the video went public. I didn't search for a press release on the reason. Believing Soulstrut was not a court of law or my former university professor, I hypothetically put my thoughts into a theory and wrote them on an online board. Unless I'm including a source or directly quoting, don't assume my thoughts on someone else's actions are facts.





Perhaps you should just stick to telling people to kill themselves online.





It's telling that in a thread on the subject of police abuse, your only interaction with the strut community is to attack others. I hope you don't treat the people in your real life like this. You're an adult. Grow the fuck up.

 

[JectWon]

PatrickCrazy said:...dude basically violated attorney-client privilege by saying that he dumped him after watching the video...




Honest question...are you more outraged about the attorney's behavior or the actions of a cop who shot and killed a man?

 

[fishmongerfunk]

so, has the traditional, soulstrut, moral-outrage shit show started yet?

 

[Brian]

DOR saidatrickCrazy said:Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah




I was going off reading that he dropped him as a client. Which happened right after the video went public. I didn't search for a press release on the reason. Believing Soulstrut was not a court of law or my former university professor, I hypothetically put my thoughts into a theory and wrote them on an online board. Unless I'm including a source or directly quoting, don't assume my thoughts on someone else's actions are facts.




Dude, I really don't understand what you're getting at here. You posted up some news, I disagreed with your take on it and said why I disagreed on it. You're talking about all these hypotheticals and whatever else but you're the one who posted something that actually happened.

It's telling that in a thread on the subject of police abuse, your only interaction with the strut community is to attack others. I hope you don't treat the people in your real life like this. You're an adult. Grow the fuck up.

I was personally attacked in the initial post without ever posting in the thread. I responded to that. I responded to your post and you got all worked up. I have not "attacked" anyone in this thread beyond the people who feel that it's necessary to mention me for no reason.





And yes, if someone says some ignorant ass garbage regarding me in real life, I react the same way. Do you react the way you do in real life when someone slightly disagrees with your ideas?

 

[Brian]

JectWon saidatrickCrazy said:...dude basically violated attorney-client privilege by saying that he dumped him after watching the video...




Honest question...are you more outraged about the attorney's behavior or the actions of a cop who shot and killed a man?








What do you think?

 

[JectWon]

PatrickCrazy said:JectWon saidatrickCrazy said:...dude basically violated attorney-client privilege by saying that he dumped him after watching the video...




Honest question...are you more outraged about the attorney's behavior or the actions of a cop who shot and killed a man?








What do you think?

You frankly seem more upset about the attorney's actions, based off the posts. I can only assume this isn't the case.





Personally, I think the attorney's actions aren't very relevant to the actual event nor do I think they will hurt the chances of a fair trial.

 

[Brian]

JectWon saidatrickCrazy said:JectWon saidatrickCrazy said:...dude basically violated attorney-client privilege by saying that he dumped him after watching the video...




Honest question...are you more outraged about the attorney's behavior or the actions of a cop who shot and killed a man?








What do you think?

You frankly seem more upset about the attorney's actions, based off the posts. I can only assume this isn't the case.





Personally, I think the attorney's actions aren't very relevant to the actual event nor do I think they will hurt the chances of a fair trial. Honestly I wasn't even going to post in this thread based on the subject matter and knowing how Soulstrut reacts to everything that doesn't follow the groupthink but decided to respond to the two idiots on the first page. I saw DOR's post later and responded to it because I was honestly baffled at his take on it.





I agree with your second paragraph for THIS particular case but don't think that applying arbitrary legal standards based on whether you like the person or not is a great path to venture down.

 

[vintageinfants]

PatrickCrazy said:Honestly I wasn't even going to post in this thread based on the subject matter and knowing how Soulstrut reacts to everything




so you decided to make the second post in the thread:





PatrickCrazy said:go kill yourself




i, and everyone else, thank you for your levity.

 

[Brian]

yeah not suspicious at all that you axed the relevant part of that sentence from your quote


good going brah

 

[kala]

 

[DOR]

PatrickCrazy said: I saw DOR's post later and responded to it because I was honestly baffled at his take on it.




Brian, I'm telling you right now. My take on it was that I read he dropped the case (Not why he did). I concluded that he saw the video and he dropped his client. My personal opinion is I respect that. Too many times we see lawyers take or continue cases because they are high profile and/or for the money. I was personally glad to see someone who see's without a doubt a murder take place and is unwilling to profit or push their profile on that. If you feel like he's being dishonest on what he's doing. That's your opinion.





I have now read this article and I will quote the following.





http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/08/exclusive-michael-slager-s-attorney-dumped-him-as-soon-as-he-saw-video.html





"I can't specifically state what is the reason why or what isn't the reason why I'm no longer his lawyer. All I can say is that the same day of the discovery of the video that was disclosed publicly, I withdrew as counsel immediately. Whatever factors people want to take from that and conclusions they want to make, they have the right to do that. But I can't confirm from an attorney-client standpoint what the reason is."





If you feel so strongly that he did something illegal or he should be disbarred. Maybe that's a cause you can take on or support someone who is.





I apologies for saying the part about attacking others. To be honest, I rarely pay much attention to what LazarusOblong post. So I missed your name attached in the first post. I still don't think it warranted you telling him to go kill himself. But whatever...





All I ask is you don't make what I said out to be that I support or advocate the lawyer in question "stage a press campaign and give interviews" if that is indeed happening. I have no opinion on that. Except if you really believe that it will "influence a jury's opinion". I wonder how much you think the video will influence the jury's opinion? Or the fact that the local police association decided not to provide funding for his legal defense...

 

[Jonny_Paycheck]

Brian trolled yall. This thread started out about bad cops and now it's about him.

 

[LaserWolf]

^Truth.

 

[fishmongerfunk]

nah, this thread was started by a confirmed troll in order to troll rock and brian. rock failed to oblige but brian took the bait.

 

[Bon Vivant]

PatrickCrazy said:Bon Vivant saidatrickCrazy said:go kill yourself




Hit too close to home?You can try it out too.





I've never said anything close to supporting anything like this but I guess if you don't fall in line with the Soulstrut hive mind people don't like it. Seems like your boy (and yourself) could not resist talking shit which is kinda sad given the subject matter.




:whambulance: :whymustIcry:

 

[Bon Vivant]

DOR said:LaserWolf said:Apparently even his union has abandoned him.


SC is a right to work state, it could be this officer shunned the union and is now getting payback.





Still, expect his lawyers to delay trail for 2 years. Defame Scott and paint him as a dangerous criminal. Get a change of venue. Convince at least one juror that Slager was afraid that Scott was an imminent danger to others. (Which is all he needs to get off.)




His first lawyer abandoned too as soon as he saw the video. Good to see a defense lawyer not give a shit about the money and just walk away.




He was probably lied to. Difficult to represent someone that gets caught lying to your face.

 

[Bon Vivant]

PatrickCrazy said:





On DOR's absurd point that this guy is somehow a good guy for dumping a client publicly like this, dude basically violated attorney-client privilege by saying that he dumped him after watching the video.




No, he didn't.





http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/08/exclusive-michael-slager-s-attorney-dumped-him-as-soon-as-he-saw-video.html





" All I can say is that the same day of the [strong]discovery of the video that was disclosed publicly[/strong], I withdrew as counsel immediately. Whatever factors people want to take from that and conclusions they want to make, they have the right to do that. [strong]But I can't confirm from an attorney-client standpoint what the reason is[/strong]. "

 

[Bon Vivant]

PatrickCrazy said:


Not trying to be rude or anything but really don't have the time to respond to all this alternate reality possible scenario stuff. Let me restate my point, legal council (who are assumed to be in possession of confidential information) should not be publicly casting suspicion on their clients (or former clients); regardless of the crime and especially while a case is still going on. This applies to anyone for any crime committed; even the ones I personally dislike. You can't make arbitrary standards based on some "well i dont think its going to influence the case so who gives a shit" shit.




Good thing this attorney didn't do any of that stuff.

 

[LaserWolf]

crabmongerfunk said:nah, this thread was started by a confirmed troll in order to troll rock and brian. rock failed to oblige but brian took the bait.




Truth.