The_Hook_Up said:Snapping said:I read this autobiography of Ginger Baker a while ago:
He came across as a pretty difficult guy to get along with. The suggestion that he might be somewhere on the spectrum kind of makes sense.
He takes a lot of trouble to emphasize that he comes from a jazz background and that he is really a jazz drummer. I think this at least partly explains his distaste for the Rolling Stones outside of Charley Watts, they just don't have "chops" in the way that he respects.
A "Jazz" drummer with the hubris to challenge Elvin Jones to a drum battle in the Royal Albert Hall and by all accounts got his ass handed to him.
He is better than average, but I have yet to be blown away by him, like I said above, Mitch Mitchell treaded the same territory and was better both in "chops" and imagination...then again Mitch was accompanying Jimi and Ginger had to accompany the bore merchant known as "slowhand".
Hmmm.
I'm not really prepared to defend Baker's drumming skills jazz or otherwise. It's certainly worth noting that his great fame is as a rock drummer not a jazz drummer.
The most interesting parts of the book (for me) were the descriptions of his early career and the scene in London that he was part of. A lot of the musicians who became part of the rock groups came from disparate backgrounds in what had been different scenes (blues, folk, jazz, etc.). Baker clearly feels an allegiance to the jazz scene that he came up in by way of the Graham Bond Organization, and that included musicians like himself, John McLaughlin, Jack Bruce and Watts.
He also is just a contrary fusker who has also slagged off:
Jimi Hendrix: "Hendrix could play okay. But he started doing all this showman shit when he sat in with us. If I had to choose a guitarist from history, I'd pick Eric over Jimi every time."
The Beatles: "I worked with George Harrison and he was a musical moron. He didn't understand music at all. He tried to explain what he wanted, and I couldn't understand a word. The only musician was George Martin, he was The Beatles. Paul McCartney boasts that he can't read music. How can a musician boast that he can't read music?"
The aforementioned Rolling Stones: "They were like a load of little kids trying to play black blues music and playing it very badly ??? but that's what people went for, because it was naive and banal. The lack of technique and musicianship was its appeal, from the start."
And pretty much every musician from his hayday who didn't directly contribute to his fame.