great example, you should do that.all they've done is beatmatched the acapella for Still Tippin with the beat for 93 till Infinity or something...weak sauce...
totallyI think it's lame when they call a mash up a "remix"... like they've actually had some creative input...
I think it's the European appropriation of the concept that most people object to
People talk about it like it's something new, when any DJ with an acappella on one turntable, an instrumental on the other, and a little imagination has probably tried something similar at some point, and long before anyone ever thought to coin the term "mash-up" either.
Yes, mash-ups are nothing new at all - that's my main beef. People flip when they hear a DJ create one like its something never done - when people been doin that shit for years, hell decades. We were doin that shit over 10 years ago. We only had like 2 crates so we would just mix EVERYTHING we could on some stupidness....People talk about it like it's something new, when a lot of us DJ's are starting out we try to mix everything we can
great example, you should do that.all they've done is beatmatched the acapella for Still Tippin with the beat for 93 till Infinity or something...weak sauce...
totallyI think it's lame when they call a mash up a "remix"... like they've actually had some creative input...
great example, you should do that.all they've done is beatmatched the acapella for Still Tippin with the beat for 93 till Infinity or something...weak sauce...
totallyI think it's lame when they call a mash up a "remix"... like they've actually had some creative input...
this has never happened.Haha sorry, it just gets annoying when there's some beat post and someone says "check out my remix" and you play it and all it is is another instrumental that someone else made under the acapella