Je Suis Charlie
- Thread starter skel
- Start date
^Yep. And either mostly refusing to publish the cartoons outright or doing so in a censored way. Professing solidarity with the murdered whilst paying fealty to their murderers. Disgusting
kicks79 said
efending freedom of speech and condemning the violent acts of an extremist few doesn't mean that you have to agree with the published content of Charlie or reprint it.
They are two separate things.
No shit Captain Obvious. But fuck you anyway.
efending freedom of speech and condemning the violent acts of an extremist few doesn't mean that you have to agree with the published content of Charlie or reprint it. They are two separate things.
No shit Captain Obvious. But fuck you anyway.
LazarusOblong said:kicks79 saidefending freedom of speech and condemning the violent acts of an extremist few doesn't mean that you have to agree with the published content of Charlie or reprint it.
They are two separate things.
No shit Captain Obvious. But fuck you anyway.
Calm down there big dog.
efending freedom of speech and condemning the violent acts of an extremist few doesn't mean that you have to agree with the published content of Charlie or reprint it. They are two separate things.
No shit Captain Obvious. But fuck you anyway.
Calm down there big dog.
At least R. Crumb was there to represent 'Murica
b/w
"Hundreds of millions of Muslims support an attack like this. They applaud an attack like this. What they say is, ‘We don’t approve of violence, but you know what? When you make fun of the Prophet, all bets are off.”
b/w
"Hundreds of millions of Muslims support an attack like this. They applaud an attack like this. What they say is, ‘We don’t approve of violence, but you know what? When you make fun of the Prophet, all bets are off.”
Rockadelic said:At least R. Crumb was there to represent 'Murica
b/w
"Hundreds of millions of Muslims support an attack like this. They applaud an attack like this. What they say is, ‘We don’t approve of violence, but you know what? When you make fun of the Prophet, all bets are off.”
There's 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. You don't think 15% of them could be in favor of punishment for blasphemy?
b/w
"Hundreds of millions of Muslims support an attack like this. They applaud an attack like this. What they say is, ‘We don’t approve of violence, but you know what? When you make fun of the Prophet, all bets are off.”
There's 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. You don't think 15% of them could be in favor of punishment for blasphemy?
Bon Vivant said:Rockadelic said:At least R. Crumb was there to represent 'Murica
b/w
"Hundreds of millions of Muslims support an attack like this. They applaud an attack like this. What they say is, ‘We don’t approve of violence, but you know what? When you make fun of the Prophet, all bets are off.”
There's 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. You don't think 15% of them could be in favor of punishment for blasphemy?
It's probably higher. Just look at our own right-wing Xian fundies. Whenever an abortion doctor is killed there's a whole lot of, "We oppose violence, but..." going on.
I don't know who Rock was quoting - maybe Bill Maher. But the quote is not wrong.
b/w
"Hundreds of millions of Muslims support an attack like this. They applaud an attack like this. What they say is, ‘We don’t approve of violence, but you know what? When you make fun of the Prophet, all bets are off.”
There's 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. You don't think 15% of them could be in favor of punishment for blasphemy?
It's probably higher. Just look at our own right-wing Xian fundies. Whenever an abortion doctor is killed there's a whole lot of, "We oppose violence, but..." going on.
I don't know who Rock was quoting - maybe Bill Maher. But the quote is not wrong.
So Charlie are going with another Mohammed cartoon on their cover.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11341453/Charlie-Hebdo-puts-Mohammed-on-cover.html
Of course, the wheaksawce Telegraph has failed to show the whole cover.
#EtesVousVraimentCharlieOuSimplementMerdeDePoulet?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11341453/Charlie-Hebdo-puts-Mohammed-on-cover.html
Of course, the wheaksawce Telegraph has failed to show the whole cover.
#EtesVousVraimentCharlieOuSimplementMerdeDePoulet?
It appears 2000 dead Nigerians don't seem to serve a political agenda in the West, so the reporting is of the tumbleweed nature in the mainstream outlets.
I read the bit about them sending a 10-year old girl into a crowd with a suicide vest on and remotely triggering it.
Truly sickening.
Where is the Nigerain Army doe?
I read the bit about them sending a 10-year old girl into a crowd with a suicide vest on and remotely triggering it.
Truly sickening.
Where is the Nigerain Army doe?
Similar threads
