Deep_Sang said:Kon's a purist when it comes to labeling something an edit, but I don't think the line is that clear. For example, the Tavares edit I posted is a straight edit with a little 808 added to the kick throughout. I'd feel like a total poseur if I tried to call that a remix. If you substantially change the vibe of a track with added elements then to me that's a remix, but if it's something really subtle just to beef it up for the club then I don't have a problem calling that an edit. I guess it gets down to splitting hairs at a certain point though.
i guess i am a purist on many levels
but i agree with you, adding an 808 doesnt make it a remix to me...
more so adding a full drum track, sampling sections and such.. it to me becomes either a remix, or a new jam.
im just defining this based on real remixes of the past and of course house and hip hop....
ive said this before....
we/ people dont call dj sneak or armand van helden, todd terry, maw, etc etc.. records where they sample/loop up a 2/4 bar sections...filters and drop a drum track over it...edits. they are referred to as straight up jams.
by todays standards and this blurred definition, the bucketheads "bomb" would be a great example. thats not an edit..sorry.
this term is thrown around constantly with other current tracks using the same techniques.
trusme being a currant example.
for hip hop, it would be anything under the umbrella of a sample with a drum track. this definition is just wrong, and would reclassify everything that has already exists.
i think its important to define whats what.