DocMcCoy said:Then there's the way in which the notion of winners and losers is so absolutely central to US sporting culture that there's no way more than a few Americans will ever truly grasp that it's possible for a 0-0 draw to still be a great game of football.
this more than your other argument.
to be honest though, the best argument i have heard tends to follow these lines:
In almost all American team sports there is a profound person that matters greatly to the game at hand, but never plays a minute. That person is the Coach. With perhaps the exception of Hockey, American sports culture is designed so that the Coach can play a very critical role in a game at almost any given minute. Calling time-outs to reset player responsibilities (NBA/NFL). Switching out key players multiple times in a game (MLB). Or in fact calling the play itself (NFL). In each sport, the Coach can at almost any time stop play or change the direction the game is going by making a decision.
The same is not true in Soccer/Football. Bar the line-up of a team, and having only 3 chances to switch players, a Soccer manager can do very little after a game has started to change the outcome. In short, it is all up to the players, and not just as extensions of a play itself.
My personal opinion is that Americans tend to enjoy that Coaching element of sports, and perhaps more so than the rest of the soccer loving world. This is not to say that its a zero-sum game in which you can only enjoy one sport or the other, but I do believe there is some element of this that Americans find engaging.
But as for your argument above Doc (i.e. - a thrilling game ends in a tie), i think there is more to add there too. Football requires a lot of build up as opposed to short bursts of activity. Preference for many people (not just Americans) is to prefer the latter. But i would agree with you, that in most circumstances Americans do like seeing a winner in their sporting events.
[rant time]
And the bigger issue i think is how Soccer/Football deals with penalties/cheating/etc. In that, in doesn't deal with it.
FIFA has established a set a rules in which only a few officials can radically change the game and there is little anyone can do during a game to impact how those calls are going.
NFL official makes a horrible call: challenge the play
MLB ump misses a lot of strikes: manager goes out (during the game) and confronts the ump (won't necessarily change the play, but the assumption is something is being 'done' about bad calls)
NBA coaches also get a lot of time to vent on bad calls, and replays can allow for correct calls in the future.
Americans, through replays or recourse, like to see correct calls made on a game. Football would argue this too, but the reality is that human error in official calls is a huge element of the game that the footballing masses love to hate. Does anyone ever really anticipate FIFA to allow video replay? I would suggest not.
And while it does occur in the NBA, diving is another element of Football that i don't think a lot of Americans can really get behind. Especially for the fact that FIFA has no desire to ever correct what is perceived as "cheating". Americans prefer their cheaters to work off camera (i.e. just take performance enhancing drugs) as opposed to cheating directly on the field of play.
Shows you how little I know....I figured that Maradona dude was running shit on the sidelines...and starring in 70's porn flicks during halftime!!