the soul capital of the world?
- Thread starter button
- Start date
I will argue for New York.
Atlantic Records.
Soul was born and nurtured on Atlantic Records.
Before Ray Charles there was Laverne Baker and Ruth Brown. Then with a little support from Jerry Wexler Ray Charles invented (Invented I Tell You!) soul music at Atlantic.
All the greatest Detroit artists, Aretha, Pickett, Eddie Floyd, Sir Mack Rice and on and on recorded for Atlantic or Atlantic's subsidiaries or studios in Memphis or Muscle Shoals.
King Curtis and the Kingpins with Bernard Purdie were pure NYC. Soul is not just about music, it is a culture. And NYC is that culture. Soul would not have been possible with out New Yorkers like Langston Hughes, and Zora Neal Hurston and Jackie Robinson. Soul couldn't have existed with out chicken and pancakes and the Village Vanguard. It couldn't have existed with out Harlem and 42nd street and the Village and Brooklyn and the Bronx and Queens. It couldn't have existed with out Xavier Cugot and Eddie Palmiere. No Brill building, no Lieber and Stoller, no Paul Winley, no Bobby Robinson = no soul.
So clearly NYC is soul.
Ha ha, just kidding.
Atlantic Records.
Soul was born and nurtured on Atlantic Records.
Before Ray Charles there was Laverne Baker and Ruth Brown. Then with a little support from Jerry Wexler Ray Charles invented (Invented I Tell You!) soul music at Atlantic.
All the greatest Detroit artists, Aretha, Pickett, Eddie Floyd, Sir Mack Rice and on and on recorded for Atlantic or Atlantic's subsidiaries or studios in Memphis or Muscle Shoals.
King Curtis and the Kingpins with Bernard Purdie were pure NYC. Soul is not just about music, it is a culture. And NYC is that culture. Soul would not have been possible with out New Yorkers like Langston Hughes, and Zora Neal Hurston and Jackie Robinson. Soul couldn't have existed with out chicken and pancakes and the Village Vanguard. It couldn't have existed with out Harlem and 42nd street and the Village and Brooklyn and the Bronx and Queens. It couldn't have existed with out Xavier Cugot and Eddie Palmiere. No Brill building, no Lieber and Stoller, no Paul Winley, no Bobby Robinson = no soul.
So clearly NYC is soul.
Ha ha, just kidding.
how? i think ruth brown only made the pop Top 40 ONCE, with an intentionally pop song that she hated to her dying day ("lucky lips")
On the NYC/La thing, I don't think I'd rank those as high as the other major hubs of the era. When you say Chicago sweet soul, Philly sweet soul, the Detroit sound, or the Memphis sound, anyone who follows the music even a little starts to get an idea of where you're going. What is the LA sound? It doesn't conjure up any identity of its own.
I suppose you have to look at it on two fronts. On the one hand, there are the major musical hubs with large populations, deep economic pockets, and lengthly musical history. On the other, the smaller cities who forged their own scenes without any of these advantages.
I suppose you have to look at it on two fronts. On the one hand, there are the major musical hubs with large populations, deep economic pockets, and lengthly musical history. On the other, the smaller cities who forged their own scenes without any of these advantages.
LA and NYC can duke it out over punk/hardcore and the late 50s and early 60s Jazz scene..but I dont think they really figure at all in this conversation...
CHICAGO
And I have the discographical research to prove it.
The Windy City had an entire stretch of the South Loop dedicated to the creation of soul music.
Detroit had three or four buildings spread over the whole town.
This a quantitative survey, not a qualitative one.
As far as the number of releases generated from a particular city (in order):
Chicago
Los Angeles
Detroit
New Orleans
Philadelphia
New York City
And until someone shows me a comprehensive Detroit soul discography, Chicago will forever have it buried under. I have two UK-built lists from the mid-80s for both Detroit and Chicago, and even then Chicago was crushing. Memphis was dominated by Stax from 1966-1976, so there weren't that many indies until the label folded and people had to go for self. To an extent, Miami was the same way, with Henry Stone and his family of labels gobbling up most of the local talent. Texas had a great amount of output, but no one city dominated (though Houston is deep).
And I have the discographical research to prove it.
The Windy City had an entire stretch of the South Loop dedicated to the creation of soul music.
Detroit had three or four buildings spread over the whole town.
This a quantitative survey, not a qualitative one.
As far as the number of releases generated from a particular city (in order):
Chicago
Los Angeles
Detroit
New Orleans
Philadelphia
New York City
And until someone shows me a comprehensive Detroit soul discography, Chicago will forever have it buried under. I have two UK-built lists from the mid-80s for both Detroit and Chicago, and even then Chicago was crushing. Memphis was dominated by Stax from 1966-1976, so there weren't that many indies until the label folded and people had to go for self. To an extent, Miami was the same way, with Henry Stone and his family of labels gobbling up most of the local talent. Texas had a great amount of output, but no one city dominated (though Houston is deep).
Chicago seems to have had more indy powerhouse labels than Detroit. And the fact we had Record Row here means that anyone could walk down Michigan Ave. back in the day and potentially get signed to an indy or major with relative ease...which also pumped the locals up to press up their own singles to promote themselves to the majors and big time indys. I don't think Detroit was really set up like that.
I would love to see the arguments in numbers for both Detroit/Chicago on paper. Seems like both cities are endless. I would gladly take all the Detroit funk 45s over all the Chicago funk 45s out there though!
I would love to see the arguments in numbers for both Detroit/Chicago on paper. Seems like both cities are endless. I would gladly take all the Detroit funk 45s over all the Chicago funk 45s out there though!
after reading over the ORIGINAL question...I'd like all of you to rethink your ideas above...the statement reads above "pound for pound which US city would you say gave us the greatest soul and funk music?"...pound for pound...means OVERALL releases...not artists, etc....just sheers numbers of contribution....therefore...not if they came from that city, or where born there, etc...what city gave us the most?
my original answer stands....Detroit/Chicago (a battle for first)...then L.A...then NYC...if you argue that with the above quote...you don't get the arguement...NOLA, Ohio, Memphis...are out of the picture...don't care they have great soul bbq, or whatever..it's POUND FOR POUND overall releases....not if you associate that city with soul/funk...
I said per capita bitch
considering the great population disparity vs chi-town, it makes Detroit's achievement even more remarkable
the detroit record row was along woodward( natch) where every major had an office, indie centers were on grand river & the linwood / 12th st area
---
Similar threads
